Reaction to the President’s remarks in Britain has been one of sheer horror

Most U.S. Presidents had good Relationships with Britain. Thatcher, Reagan and then Bush and Blair had very good relationships. America and Britain has stood together for many years so why is Obama degrading Britain? To understand why Britain is sounding back at  Barack Obama remarks you need to read the article below!

Obama has been insistent that it is ‘British Petroleum’ that is at fault and British Petroleum’s ass that, in his now notorious phrase, ‘he wants to kick’.

And kick it he has, with BP’s shares in which one in every six pounds of British retirement funds is placed plummeting as a result. The kick has had an effect, but it has also caused a rebound.

Reaction to the President’s remarks in Britain has been one of sheer horror. Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, described “something slightly worrying about the anti-British rhetoric that seems to be permeating from America. I would like to see a bit of cool heads rather than endlessly buck-passing and name-calling. When you consider the huge exposure of British pension funds to BP it starts to become a matter of national concern if a great British company is being continually beaten up on the airwaves.”

The former Conservative Party chairman under Margaret Thatcher, Lord Tebbit, meanwhile said: ‘The whole might of American wealth and technology is displayed as utterly unable to deal with the disastrous spill so what more natural than a crude, bigoted, xenophobic display of partisan political Presidential petulance against a multinational company.’

If these reactions seem high-pitched it is probably because British politicians have been surprised by a number of less than cordial soundings from the US since Obama became President.

Whether they have been intended or not, the picture they begin to paint of Obama’s view of Britain is enough to cause concern.

Barack Obama is the least naturally pro-British of any of the 12 postwar presidents. He is under the (probably mistaken) impression that his grandfather was tortured by the British during the Mau Mau emergency, and therefore sees Winston Churchill – the PM at the time of the Kenyan troubles – as a symbol of evil imperialism more than a hero of anti-Fascism. The BP reaction is all of a piece with this lack of sentimental attachment to the Special Relationship. Prime Minister David Cameron has got his work cut out if Obama is to be persuaded of the special role the English-speaking peoples play in defending Western Civilisation. READ MORE AT SOURCE

LINKS:

(1) Is there any truth in there anywhere?   by Tarheeltalker

‘The great British love-in with Barack Obama may be coming to an end.’

Obama’s blame game has hurt him in  foreign affairs, Obama talks tough then when talking on phone face to face with Mr Cameron Obama acts and talks like a little kitten!

President Obama has been accused of ‘trashing’ BP in a bid to curry favour ahead of midterm elections in the autumn.

Richard Ottoway, Tory chairman of the Commons foreign affairs committee, said Washington had no right to interfere with BP’s decision on whether or not to pay a dividend.

And former Labour trade minister and CBI chief Lord [Digby] Jones, said British people would like to see Mr Cameron be ‘more forceful’.

Lord Jones said: ‘You know, it was an American company that built this rig, it was an American company that operated it, it’s an American regulator that told these people not to go shallow but go out deep where the technology is at the borders of what we can do. It’s the American population that take the black stuff and puts it into their gas guzzlers.’

President Obama has also faced a backlash over his savage criticism of BP, with accusations that by passing the buck for the environmentally disastrous oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico to the company, he is damaging the U.S. economy. READ MORE AT THE SOURCE

LINKS:

(1)  Mr Obama – Ever The Professional!

BP oil spill: David Cameron caught in middle

I don’t think David Cameron has anything to worry about from the weakest president that The United States has ever had, Obama is trailing no other than Jimmy Carter.

 

The government moved to quell suggestions of indifference to the BP oil disaster today when both David Cameron and the chancellor, George Osborne, spoke to BP’s chairman, Carl-Henric Svanberg, urging all sides to find a constructive solution to the environmental crisis.

Cameron and Osborne are involved in a delicate balancing act, facing calls to stand up to Barack Obama’s criticisms of BP and the anti-British sentiment on which the US president seems to be trading. At the same time, Cameron cannot afford to wreck the so-called special relationship by being seen to attack Obama on an issue that is causing the president political trouble. But sources said BP would be in “listening mode” when its executives meet Obama in what is expected to be a difficult encounter, given that the US president has made personal attacks on Hayward and the company which have unnerved the financial markets and sent the BP share price spiralling downwards.

Earlier, the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, warned that a row between Britain and the United States over the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico risked turning into a futile and destructive bout of “megaphone diplomacy”.
Read More at the SOURCE