<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rep. Waxman Wants to Apply Censorship Doctrine to Internet! (He wants to WAX BLOGGERS)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/02/18/rep-waxman-wants-to-apply-censorship-doctrine-to-internet-he-wants-to-wax-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/02/18/rep-waxman-wants-to-apply-censorship-doctrine-to-internet-he-wants-to-wax-bloggers/</link>
	<description>politics, democrats, republicans, Midterm elections elections, news, race, John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, government, White House, President Bush</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodtimepolitics</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/02/18/rep-waxman-wants-to-apply-censorship-doctrine-to-internet-he-wants-to-wax-bloggers/#comment-6042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goodtimepolitics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5782#comment-6042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have to remember that our State of North Carolina went for Obama and so we should expect such a thing from the democrats here!  I&#039;m happy to say that I did not vote for even one democrat!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have to remember that our State of North Carolina went for Obama and so we should expect such a thing from the democrats here!  I&#8217;m happy to say that I did not vote for even one democrat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjjrdq</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/02/18/rep-waxman-wants-to-apply-censorship-doctrine-to-internet-he-wants-to-wax-bloggers/#comment-6041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rjjrdq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5782#comment-6041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberal blogs grossly outnumber conservative blogs. I wonder how they will make that more fair?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal blogs grossly outnumber conservative blogs. I wonder how they will make that more fair?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarheeltalker</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/02/18/rep-waxman-wants-to-apply-censorship-doctrine-to-internet-he-wants-to-wax-bloggers/#comment-6039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tarheeltalker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5782#comment-6039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a bill before the NC legislature- S-46 concerning controls on bloggers and perhaps even making them subject to libel and slander laws because they (blogs) are just out of control.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a bill before the NC legislature- S-46 concerning controls on bloggers and perhaps even making them subject to libel and slander laws because they (blogs) are just out of control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lukemcgook</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/02/18/rep-waxman-wants-to-apply-censorship-doctrine-to-internet-he-wants-to-wax-bloggers/#comment-6037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lukemcgook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5782#comment-6037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition to &quot;fairness,&quot; terms to watch out for include &quot;diversity,&quot; &quot;alternative views,&quot; &quot;advisory boards,&quot; &quot;community needs,&quot; &quot;oversight,&quot; &quot;competing interests,&quot; &quot;balance,&quot; &quot;accountability,&quot; &quot;dialogue.&quot;  

The Obama has stated that he opposes re-instituting the Fairness Doctrine, but, as is always the case when the Obama goes on record, his statement means nothing.  The new Fairness Doctrine will masquerade as something else -- attending to &quot;community needs,&quot; say.  Keep in mind that the Obama&#039;s campaign featured massive action to shut down radio shows, threatening TV stations with lawsuits, and assigning &quot;truth squads&quot; of local officials to intimidate opponents.  The Obama is no friend of free speech, nor of any kind of freedom.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to &#8220;fairness,&#8221; terms to watch out for include &#8220;diversity,&#8221; &#8220;alternative views,&#8221; &#8220;advisory boards,&#8221; &#8220;community needs,&#8221; &#8220;oversight,&#8221; &#8220;competing interests,&#8221; &#8220;balance,&#8221; &#8220;accountability,&#8221; &#8220;dialogue.&#8221;  </p>
<p>The Obama has stated that he opposes re-instituting the Fairness Doctrine, but, as is always the case when the Obama goes on record, his statement means nothing.  The new Fairness Doctrine will masquerade as something else &#8212; attending to &#8220;community needs,&#8221; say.  Keep in mind that the Obama&#8217;s campaign featured massive action to shut down radio shows, threatening TV stations with lawsuits, and assigning &#8220;truth squads&#8221; of local officials to intimidate opponents.  The Obama is no friend of free speech, nor of any kind of freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

