<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With all due respect Mr. President, that is not true.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/</link>
	<description>politics, democrats, republicans, Midterm elections elections, news, race, John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, government, White House, President Bush</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodtimepolitics</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/#comment-6369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goodtimepolitics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5225#comment-6369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January 31: We shall see 2 years from now where The Mixed Bag of Nuts Obama will be standing. Could be in a pile of sh_t or could be on a pile of The American people tax money!

FEB 28:  Looks like its going to be a pile of Americans tax money!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>January 31: We shall see 2 years from now where The Mixed Bag of Nuts Obama will be standing. Could be in a pile of sh_t or could be on a pile of The American people tax money!</p>
<p>FEB 28:  Looks like its going to be a pile of Americans tax money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodtimepolitics</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/#comment-5586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goodtimepolitics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5225#comment-5586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[75% of &lt;strong&gt;Democrats&lt;/strong&gt; strongly approve!  I would suppost that 75% &lt;strong&gt;Republicans &lt;/strong&gt;would not strongly approve of Obama = 50% or lower! 
Fifty-two percent (&lt;strong&gt;52%&lt;/strong&gt;) say the President is doing a good or an excellent job on economic issues and &lt;strong&gt;50%&lt;/strong&gt; say the same about national security issues.
Floating right around 50% isn&#039;t it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>75% of <strong>Democrats</strong> strongly approve!  I would suppost that 75% <strong>Republicans </strong>would not strongly approve of Obama = 50% or lower!<br />
Fifty-two percent (<strong>52%</strong>) say the President is doing a good or an excellent job on economic issues and <strong>50%</strong> say the same about national security issues.<br />
Floating right around 50% isn&#8217;t it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/#comment-5583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caleb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5225#comment-5583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Progressive = progress.  Look to the future, not to the past.  

goodtimepolitics
way to separate the parts you want to see and the ones you don&#039;t.  How does, 50% Strongly approve and 20% Strongly disapprove equate to 50/50 for you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Progressive = progress.  Look to the future, not to the past.  </p>
<p>goodtimepolitics<br />
way to separate the parts you want to see and the ones you don&#8217;t.  How does, 50% Strongly approve and 20% Strongly disapprove equate to 50/50 for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lukemcgook</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/#comment-5568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lukemcgook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5225#comment-5568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Caleb.  Just went over to your blog.  It is a truly brilliant parody of jelly-brained progressivism.  Keep up the good work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caleb.  Just went over to your blog.  It is a truly brilliant parody of jelly-brained progressivism.  Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodtimepolitics</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/#comment-5565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goodtimepolitics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5225#comment-5565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rasmussen report
January 30, 2009: Seventy-five percent &lt;strong&gt;(75%) of Democrats Strongly Approve&lt;/strong&gt; of the President’s performance along with 30% of unaffiliated voters and 14% of Republicans.
January 29, 2009:&lt;strong&gt; Fifty-two percent (52%) say the President is doing a good or an excellent job on economic&lt;/strong&gt; issues and 50% say the same about national security issues. 
January 26, 2009:&lt;strong&gt;The President’s negatives have risen a bit since he assumed office and 20% now Strongly Disapprove of his performance.&lt;/strong&gt; That stems largely from growing disapproval from conservatives. The higher negatives give Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of &lt;strong&gt;+21, his lowest rating as President or President-elect since before Thanksgiving. &lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;goodtimepolitics:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;Looks to be about 50/50 when it is figured out where and from who the approval ratings are coming from.  We shall see 2 years from now where The Mixed Bag of Nuts Obama will be standing.  Could be in  a pile of sh_t or could be on a pile of The American people tax money!&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rasmussen report<br />
January 30, 2009: Seventy-five percent <strong>(75%) of Democrats Strongly Approve</strong> of the President’s performance along with 30% of unaffiliated voters and 14% of Republicans.<br />
January 29, 2009:<strong> Fifty-two percent (52%) say the President is doing a good or an excellent job on economic</strong> issues and 50% say the same about national security issues.<br />
January 26, 2009:<strong>The President’s negatives have risen a bit since he assumed office and 20% now Strongly Disapprove of his performance.</strong> That stems largely from growing disapproval from conservatives. The higher negatives give Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of <strong>+21, his lowest rating as President or President-elect since before Thanksgiving. </strong></p>
<p><strong>goodtimepolitics:</strong> <em>Looks to be about 50/50 when it is figured out where and from who the approval ratings are coming from.  We shall see 2 years from now where The Mixed Bag of Nuts Obama will be standing.  Could be in  a pile of sh_t or could be on a pile of The American people tax money!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/#comment-5564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caleb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5225#comment-5564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11 days in?  It hasn&#039;t even started yet.  

His approval is 67%, up 1% from yesterday (http://www.gallup.com/Home.aspx) on Gallup,

 63% on Rasmussen (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_approval_index),

and 75% on Research 2000.

It&#039;s going to be a hard four years for you guys, now that intelligence and social justice are key instead of religious dogma and trickle down voodoo economics.

Cel-e-brate good times, come on!  I&#039;m looking forward to after Obama&#039;s eight years, when we can elect a true liberal into office.  

Conservatism is, cough, cough, gasping, for air.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11 days in?  It hasn&#8217;t even started yet.  </p>
<p>His approval is 67%, up 1% from yesterday (<a href="http://www.gallup.com/Home.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.gallup.com/Home.aspx</a>) on Gallup,</p>
<p> 63% on Rasmussen (<a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_approval_index" rel="nofollow">http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_approval_index</a>),</p>
<p>and 75% on Research 2000.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be a hard four years for you guys, now that intelligence and social justice are key instead of religious dogma and trickle down voodoo economics.</p>
<p>Cel-e-brate good times, come on!  I&#8217;m looking forward to after Obama&#8217;s eight years, when we can elect a true liberal into office.  </p>
<p>Conservatism is, cough, cough, gasping, for air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodtimepolitics</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/#comment-5540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goodtimepolitics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5225#comment-5540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two years of Obama and the American people will be sick of the democrats socialist policies!   The Obama honeymoon is over!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years of Obama and the American people will be sick of the democrats socialist policies!   The Obama honeymoon is over!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/#comment-5539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caleb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5225#comment-5539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[formerly 23five23]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>formerly 23five23</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/#comment-5538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caleb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5225#comment-5538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, good luck with that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, good luck with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waltersdimention</title>
		<link>http://goodtimepolitics.com/2009/01/28/with-all-due-respect-mr-president-that-is-not-true/#comment-5528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[waltersdimention]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodtimepolitics.com/?p=5225#comment-5528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[23five23 you are correct, the Republican party is dying and they should die but the conservative movement will grow and we will win and reform the republicans to its true conservative beginning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>23five23 you are correct, the Republican party is dying and they should die but the conservative movement will grow and we will win and reform the republicans to its true conservative beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

