Political Interference Seen in Bank Bailout Decisions –

In December OneUnited got a $12 million injection from the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. One apparent factor: the intercession of Rep. Barney Frank, the powerful head of the House Financial Services Committee.

Mr. Frank, by his own account, wrote into the TARP bill a provision specifically aimed at helping this particular home-state bank. And later, he acknowledges, he spoke to regulators urging that OneUnited be considered for a cash injection.

Bankers, regulators and politicians complain of a secretive and opaque process for deciding which banks get cash and which don’t. The goal of aiding only banks healthy enough to lend — laid out by the Treasury when the program began — clearly seems to have shifted, but in a way that’s hard to pin down and that the Treasury has declined to explain. Part of the problem is that some powerful politicians have used their leverage to try to direct federal millions toward banks in their home states. ”It’s totally arbitrary,” says South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford. “If you’ve got the right lobbyist and the right representative connected to Washington or the right ties to Washington, you get the golden tap on the shoulder,” says Gov. Sanford, a Republican.

Read More

Already some dirty politics getting into your tax money! Obama isn’t protecting our money to good now is he, when he allows the politicians to give it out to their favorite banks and who know who else!

Advertisement

One comment on “Political Interference Seen in Bank Bailout Decisions –

  1. There’s always political interference in government spending programs. Your congressman is always completely open to ideas for re-directing the gravy train. This time around, though, I gotta say the thieves are getting bolder.

Comments are closed.