News Media Slammed Bush’s ‘Extravagant’ Inaugural in ’05, But Now It’s Spend, Baby, Spend

The press suggested it was in poor taste for Republicans to spend $40 million on President Bush’s inauguration, the impact that kind of money would have on armoring Humvees in Iraq, helping victims of the tsunami, or paying down the deficit.

Will Barack Obama’s inauguration estimated to cost $45 million impact the severe recession and federal budget deficits topping $1 trillion as far as the eye can see?
Double Standard? Read More

LINKS:

(1) $150,000,000: “[Y]ou don’t want it to look like a schlock affair”
(2) Where are all the Anti-Inauguration activists now?

Comments
One Response to “News Media Slammed Bush’s ‘Extravagant’ Inaugural in ’05, But Now It’s Spend, Baby, Spend”
  1. lukemcgook says:

    I think the total bill is now est’d at something like $150 million. That’s fine with me, but it’s a disgrace the way the “greater good” media types of four years ago are now dampening their panties at the prospect of an Obama blowout. Journalists are scum.

  • Where I’m coming from!

    As a person that's been around the country and seen what America was and now what she has became makes me sick. I keep up with the news and what's going on and try to state my opinion of the way I feel about the U.S. Government and the way it's dictating our every day personal lives. I'm not a conservative or am I a liberal, just call me a good American citizen that will vote for the person based on their past history. Thanks for stopping by and I hope you enjoy the post I make.