Comments on: Will Barack Obama Keep You Safe From Terrorist? (What no comments from you liberals, I didn’t think so!)

By: lukemcgook

lukemcgook — Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:27:12 +0000

LOL @ migrating pebbles.

Also @ di’s statement of what is probably my favorite instance of leftoid magical thinking.

Every time we kill a “potential terrorist” in Iraq, we manage to create ten more worldwide.

By: Craig

Craig — Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:13:59 +0000

Diogenes, the pebbles have grown and migrated from your mouth upwards in your head. Your opening sentence tells us Mr. Bush cannot keep us safe while your closing tells us he allowed us to be attacked! Which is it? In fact, Mr. Bush has, with his efforts, kept us safe since 9/11; policies enacted on his predecessor’s watch permitted that day of infamies. It will not take acts of commission on Mr. Obama’s part to decrease our security; it will be acts of omission that prevent closing of holes in our security net.

By: diogenes

diogenes — Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:58:22 +0000

Despite Bushie’s rhetoric to the contrary, a President doesn’t keep us safe from terrorists. There are thousands of individuals that do that, and they’re not going away.

Are you really stupid enough to think that Obama will intentionally act to decrease our security? If so, you’re nuts. That kind of thought only stems from your absurd notion that Obama is a Muslim terrorist mole, born in Kenya, trained in Indonesia, and ready to open the floodgates for al Qaeda in America.

Rubbish.

If anything, I MIGHT feel safer with President Obama than Bushie. Time will tell. But Obama seems to understand that America’s standing in the world tends to diminish with our almost constant flexing of our muscle. Every time we kill a “potential terrorist” in Iraq, we manage to create ten more worldwide.

Besides, Bushie already spotted Obama a huge advantage: unless and until we have another 9-11, Bushie is guaranteed of holding the record for being the President who allowed the biggest terrorist attack on U.S. soil.