Google ‘censoring’ anti-Obama bloggers?

Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs claims the search engine giant has banned her groundbreaking articles about Obama – a technique many people refer to as “sandboxing.”

“There was no warning, no notice, nothing,” Geller told WND. “They have basically sandboxed me.”

“Sandboxing” happens when Google strips a website’s rankings from its search engine results.

Google spokewoman Elisabeth Diana told WND, “Atlas Shrugs was in violation of our terms of service. When we are made aware of a potentital policy violation, our team of specialists will manually review the site to make sure it abides by our program policies. In this case, we have stopped serving ads to Atlas Shrugs.”

However, Gellar believes her stories have been intentionally suppressed by the Internet giant – especially ones about President-elect Obama. She said her exclusive stories about Obama’s birth certificate that once received thousands of hits every day will not come up in Google word searches.

“I was in the top five search results before the story got legs,” she said. “These stories drove 12,000 to 15,000 people to my site every day.”
Click here for the rest of the story

Let me ask, as bloggers are you being censored by Google and the B. Hussein Obama new socialist government? Google CEO endorsed Obama from what I have been reading. So does Obama have an investment in Google that we don’t know about? Just asking! :)

LINKS:
(1) Suppression of the Media in Kenya

(2) Google censoring websites critical of Obama


Comments
5 Responses to “Google ‘censoring’ anti-Obama bloggers?”
  1. lukemcgook says:

    Well, whatever Google was up to, they seem to have stopped. You can raise “Atlas Shrugs” now. But, yes, I wouldn’t be surprised if Schmidt were using Google to do Obama favors. Soon, he’ll likely be using Obama to do Google favors.

    Media control is where it’s at for progressives.

    (Now, wait for Diogenes to get started on “corporate media” and Fox News. )

  2. goodtimepolitics says:

    Sure smells like a dirty politician play pen! Do you smell that?

  3. lukemcgook says:

    There are Senators, even some Donks, gunning for Holder. I think I’ll go see who’s taking bets on his confirmation.

  4. lukemcgook says:

    Oops, thought I had the Holder thread, but I see I’ve got the Schmidt thread. Say, at least one Obama pick bit the dust yesterday after being connected to Clinton’s end-of-term clemency festival. A congressman named Becerra was O’s pick for trade representative, but it looked like his lobbying on behalf of a big time coke dealer would have sunk his chances, so he bowed out. May Holder enjoy the same fate.

  5. lukemcgook says:

    Well, this may be a chance for Obama to return the google-favor. Google has long been a supporter of an anti-competitive internet regime called “net neutrality” (details not real important). Last time I looked, Barry O was also a supporter of net neutrality. Just recently, however, Google has switched to opposing net neutrality, again in consideration of competitive advantages. They’d probably like the New Leader to switch, too. We’ll see.

  • Where I’m coming from!

    As a person that's been around the country and seen what America was and now what she has became makes me sick. I keep up with the news and what's going on and try to state my opinion of the way I feel about the U.S. Government and the way it's dictating our every day personal lives. I'm not a conservative or am I a liberal, just call me a good American citizen that will vote for the person based on their past history. Thanks for stopping by and I hope you enjoy the post I make.