Comments on: UPDATED DECEMBER 06 – Petitioners: If you’re eligible, show us the proof!

By: Ed Darrell

Ed Darrell — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:19:09 +0000

Legally, Obama’s made the showing of eligibility at least six times.

In order to challenge those six showings, you gotta have evidence.

Not an iota of challenge to any of these six showings yet:
http://timpanogos.wordpress.com/2008/12/26/fail-repeated-challenges-to-obamas-eligibility/

By: goodtimepolitics

goodtimepolitics — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:44:07 +0000

A spokesman for the court said the decision on whether to hear the suit brought by retired New Jersey lawyer Leo Donofrio is likely to be announced next week.

“Since Barack Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya, and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth, then Senator Obama was a British citizen ‘at birth,’ just like the framers of the Constitution, and therefore, even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on U.S. soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be president.”

Kenya was British East Africa until it received its independence in 1963.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/dec/06/obama-challenge-awaits-a-decision/

We will just have to wait and see! If the court does not hear this case then anyone no matter what country they are from could run and become president of The United States! That would mean that this country is lost!

By: diogenes

diogenes — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:04:29 +0000

Why would you think that? Lots of times, SCOTUS doesn’t even bother to announce cases on which they decided not to grant cert. They fade away into ignominy, the way they should.

SCOTUS “didn’t delay action”. They simply didn’t make any announcements and they went home to their homes and their lives for a weekend watching Army-Navy and NFL football.

This just goes to show how desperate bloggers will spin anything they can into a story.

By: goodtimepolitics

goodtimepolitics — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:38:36 +0000

Court delays action on suit makes me think that the suit has a good chance of being heard. What do you think?

By: lukemcgook

lukemcgook — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:46:02 +0000

Interesting how the media, when they bother to cover the issue at all, get bunches of facts wrong. I don’t know how many times I’ve read that Hawaiian officials have stated that Obama was born in Honolulu. They never have.

By: goodtimepolitics

goodtimepolitics — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:23:36 +0000

Today 5 Dec is the day we should find out if this goes away or sticks around for awhile longer. The question now is….is he is he not! LOL

By: goodtimepolitics

goodtimepolitics — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:21:48 +0000

I’m like you, that there must be something that he does not want people to know! I really can not see the government letting someone run for president thats not a citizen, but you never know by the way the government has been ran for the last 50 years!

By: lukemcgook

lukemcgook — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:14:15 +0000

di, the Code is current as of 2007 — June, I think. The relevant provision covers births after 1952. Unless there’s some sort of problem with Congress awarding citizenship retroactively, Obama is a “citizen at birth,” even if Mom-based in Mombasa. Also, he’s a clown, although it is not clear whether he is a “clown at birth.”

By: goodtimepolitics

goodtimepolitics — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:52:32 +0000

Yes diogenes I delete comments that is no more than name calling by you and your sidekick from that racist redneck state, yes thats the one I was sure you would remember the state that the people are bitter and clinging to their guns.

By: diogenes

diogenes — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:15:19 +0000

I answered you, luke… the “thought police” a.k.a. GTP deletd it, for no apparent reason.

Well, maybe there is a reason…

GTP often deletes posts that are beyond his level of comprehension. And since I don’t know how to draw cartoons on here, I guess I’m stuck.