Obamas enjoy fine food, wine! Spreading The Wealth – Michelle Obama
Obama’s aversion to beets aside – “I always avoid eating them,” he says – the new first family are foodies with a wide-ranging palate. They have hankerings for Mexican food, enjoy hand-crafted pastas and their kids dig fried chicken and macaroni and cheese.
At Bayless’ restaurant, Obama and his wife, Michelle, usually begin their meals with tortilla soup and guacamole as starters, followed by something from a changing seasonal menu to reflect the freshest fare.
The Obamas aren’t teetotalers, partaking of the restaurant’s margaritas and wine.
SOURCE
This is the face of our next First Lady, who some really strange people let get put in our White House. Such a loving demeanor. Now, let’s not forget that the Pie she so eloquently spoke of didn’t come out of the 4 million that they made last year. What, they gave something like less than 5% to charity. Yet, they want to take much more than that from my paycheck to give someone who doesn’t necessarily deserve a larger piece. NO, NO, NO.
Thanks to
Spreading The Wealth – Michelle Obama
Remember this when Obama starts talking about the American people tighten their belts as to give to others in more need of your hard earned money!
LINKS:
Obama A History of Socialist Policies/Beliefs
A 7-year-old radio interview in which Barack Obama discussed the failure of the Supreme Court to rule on redistributing wealth in its civil rights rulings has given fresh ammunition to critics who say the Democratic presidential candidate has a socialist agenda. READ MORE



President Obama has just CHANGE America !!
Not to worry, I feel certain their charitable contributions will go to at least 6%.
Yes its looks like the same old rich Washington DC politicians and big time rich CEO’s of companies while the poor black and white people that voted Obama into the White House is losing money still or the ones that had a savings is still losing! No change there as I can see!
And with the ones he’s picking for his admin tells me its the same old politics with the Clintons another 4 years!
By the way, you’ve included a forgery on your website. That receipt from the Waldorf Astoria that you claim Michelle Obama signed, for $447.39? It’s a forgery. It’s a lie. It was originally printed in the NY Post, and they retracted the story. Michelle Obama was in a campaign plane at that time, leaving Ft. Wayne, Indiana. Check it out yourself:
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/30/FakeReceipt
http://m.nypost.com/ms/p/nyp/nyp/s3UwUJ05zFWj9CuuCukyCgg/view.m?id=23202&storyid=134490
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/roomservice.asp
But it does show to what depths some Obama haters will go to spread their lies.
And no, I don’t expect this to see the light of day on your website. You’ve been pretty adept, so far, in spreading lies and then deleting any posts that try to correct your lies!
“No wonder media is so enthralled with the cool Obama and his wife. Both embody the new nexus between Eurosocialism in the abstract and the hip aristocratic life in the concrete.” — Victor Davis Hanson
We’re looking forward to four years of government by lightweights — ignoramuses with fusspot lifestyle concerns. Should be fun to watch, at least.
Here we go again with diogenes says forgery, on the birth cert this same diogenes says not forgery, so are you a expert on such a issue or are you relying on Obama supporter sites still? The Obama family has been lying from the start of the campaign and has been caught enough times that we can not trust him anymore as you do diogenes. I’m still wondering how much or what is it that you defend Obama and his lying?
I can understand why you would think that stopthesmears.com is biased, since it was run by the Obama campaign. That’s why I included the links to the New York Post, which is run by Rupert Murdoch — hardly an Obama supporter. And snopes.com isn’t run by Obama, either.
I’m not trusting Obama. I check stuff out when it smells fishy — which includes damn near everything off your keyboard. Take a look at snopes.com and all the lies put out there by slime like you. They’ve almost all been thoroughly debunked. But you guys keep oozing out from beneath the rocks where you reside. So many lies, so little time and energy to debunk it all.
This whole Waldorf-Astoria thing is a lie, and you’re too lazy to even check it out. Abd you definitely don’t have the testicular fortitude to admit you posted a forgery. That would be like George W. admitting he once made a mistake.
“Slime”? “Slime”? I thought the 52 were supposed to be reaching out to the 48?
Hey goodtimepol,
Great post, and nice blog. You commented on one of my posts at jackandrupertsmom, and I appreciate that.
I’ve moved my political blogs to conservativepup now. Come visit me there; I wrote a piece a few days ago about this very thing, Michelle Obama’s splitting up of the “pie”. As if there is only one finite pie for all to share, instead of an infinite number.
Keep up the good work. We’ll all work together to keep this country true to the Constitution.
Pup
Ok will do Pup, Thanks! I put a link back to your post, hope its ok with you.
http://conservativepup.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/a-pie-or-a-bakery/
Those of the 48 who lie aren’t worth reaching out to. This blogger is a liar.goodtimepolitics: When you can’t take the heat and start calling me a lier then I feel sorry for your kind diogenes! By-the-way why is it that everyone thats hanging around mudflats is trying to sound like they are from Alaska when in fact they’re here in the lower 48.
I’m pretty sure lukemcgook was referring to the 52% of the electorate that voted for Obama vs. the 48% that voted for McCain. Tat was what my response trageted. It has nothing to do with Sister Sarah and Alaska, you cretin. Sarah Palin is and will be an irrelevant footnote to losing Republican electoral history, unless we somehow get lucky and have her be the 2012 nominee.
What else would you call a person who posts known falsehoods on their blog? “Liar” is the best word I could think of. This whole trashy piece of yours have been thoroughly debunked, and even the newspaper that printed it retracted the story in quite strenuous terms. yet you continue to promote the lie?
Why is that?